RealPatient

Efficacy

PFS

ORR (1 month)

61%

CR (1 month)

29%

OS at 12 months

45%

Safety
CRSGrade ≥3

6%

ICANSGrade ≥3

4%

“Baseline characteristics for patients prescribed Tisa-cel or other products in Spain do not differ significantly, and within this setting, results are comparable in terms of efficacy”

  • Reference: 1. Kwon M et al. American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting, 11–14 December 2021, Atlanta, GA. Abstract 1742.

Data collection

Nov 2018–May 2021

Spanish Group of Stem Cell Transplantation (GETH-TC) and Spanish Group of Lymphoma and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (GELTAMO)

Median follow-up

  months

No. of patients infused with tisa-cel

 

Median age (range) years61 (23–76)
Gender (male)63%
ECOG ≥28%
IPI32%
HG lymphoma
(double or triple hit)
16%
DLBCL74%
Transformed lymphoma20%
ComorbiditiesNR
LDH elevated66%
Prior therapies, median (IQR)≥3 lines2 (2–7)NR
Primary refractoryRefractory to last lineRelapsed56%NRNR
Prior SCTAutoAllo29%1%
Bridging therapy83%
Median vein to vein time51 days

Limitations: Majority of patients (55%) were progressing prior to infusion despite bridging

  • Reference: 1. Kwon M et al. American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting, 11–14 December 2021, Atlanta, GA. Abstract 1742.

Patient
summary

Your patient summary will be shown here as you save you patient selections

This is where your patient summary will be shown. If you would like more tailored data, create a patient profile

Start a patient profile

3L+ DLBCL PATIENT

Patient profile

  • Incomplete

Treatment history

  • Incomplete

Treatment choice

  • Incomplete